Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Chhabilendra Roul, A, Rajveer Singh Verma, J
Sh. Sudhir Kumar Thakkar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant seeking quash of recovery orders and financial upgradation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding legal entitlements and recovery implications. (Para 4 , 7) |
| 3. court observations on the principles of natural justice. (Para 5 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. clarification on macp implications and recovery limitations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. summary of the macp scheme and its applications. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. concluding remarks on the ruling and directives issued. (Para 19 , 22 , 23) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Mr. Rajveer Singh Verma, Member (J) :-
The applicant has filed the instant OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , seeking the following relief(s) :-
“8.1 May kindly be pleased to quash and set aside impugned Orders at Annexure A/1, A/2 and A/3 respectively and issue appropriate directions to the Respondents to release the money recovered from the Applicant vide impugned order dated 04.09.2015 (Annexure A-2),
8.2 Direct the Respondents to extend the benefit of High Court of Madras in WP No 13225/2010 Sh. M Subramaniam vs Uol & Ors and accordingly quash the offsetting of MACP up-gradation with the time scale and direct the Respondents to grant grade
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
