2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 113
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sushil Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
North Eastern Railway – Respondent
O.A./154/2024
Reserved On 08.12.2025 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH ALLAHABAD *********
Original Application No. 154 of 2024 Allahabad this the 06th day of January, 2026 Hon’ble Mr. Rajnish Kumar Rai, Member-J Hon’ble Ms. Manju Pandey, Member-A
1. Sushil Kumar Singh, Aged about 50 Years, Son of late Vijay Pratap Singh, Resident of 136-N, Ashok Nagar, Basaratpur, Gorakhpur.
2. Shivanand Srivastava, Son of Laxmi Prasad Srivastava, Resident of 193-
Q, Mayur Vihar, Shivapuram, Basaratpur East, Gorakhpur.
3. Devendra Nath Tripathi, Son of Late Ganga Prasad Tripathi, Resident of Ganga Sadan, Rajendra Nagar (East), Gorakhpur.
4. Rajendra Pratap Singh, Son of Late Ramjeet Singh, Resident of 596G, New Colony, Shahpur, near Shiv Mandir, Geeta Vatika, Gorakhpur.
5. Markandey Singh, Son of Late Vishwanath Singh, Resident of Village Belahi, Post Chauri Chaura, Gorakhpur.
6. Sanjay Kumar Upadhyay, Son of late Shivpoojan Upadhyay, Resident of
44D, Shivpur Shahbajganj, Gorakhpur.
7. Rajendra, Son of Kunj Bihari, Resident of 223F, Saraswatipuram, Lane-3, Jail Bypass Road, Gorakhpur.
8. Vinod Kumar Singh, Son of Satya Dev Singh, Resident of Plot No. 368, H.
No.124, Meera Nagar (Kanchanpur), Post Kandawa, District Gorakhpur.
9. Devendra Nath Singh, Son of Late Udai Bhan Singh, Resident of 213-F, Shatabdipuram, Jungle Salikram, Gorakhpur.
10. Saroj Kumar Shukla, Son of Shri Shiva Kant Shukla, Resident of
538KA/881, Triveni Nagar-3, 60 Fit Road, Shiv Lok, Lucknow.
11. Ganesh Dutt Sahi, Son of Shri Ram Sahi, Resident of Village Badaya Bujurg, Post Sukrauli, District - Kushinagar.
MANISH MEHROTRA
12 Ram Daras Yadav, Son of Padarath Yadav, Resident of H. No. 539, Jatepur East, Kali Mandir, Gorakhnath, Gorakhpur.
13. Ashutosh Kumar Sinha, Son of Late R. N. Verma, Resident of House No.210F, Shatabdipuram, Near Fatima Hospital, Padri bazaar, Gorakhpur.
14 Yogendra Pratap Singh, presently working as Instructor, Workshop Training Centre, Mechanical Workshop, North Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur.
15. Chandra Shekhar Srivastava, Son of Shri Jagdish Prasad Srivastava, Resident of 637, Humayupur East, Gorakhpur.
16. Pankaj Kumar Srivastava, presently posted as Chief Trainer, Workshop Training Centre, Mechanical Workshop, North Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur.
Applicants By Advocate: Shri Ashish Srivastava Vs.
1. Union of India through General Manager, North Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur.
2. Principal Chief Personnel Officer, North Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur. 3. Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, North Eastern Railway, Lucknow
4. Senior Divisional Personnel officer, North Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur.
Respondents By Advocate: Shri Krishna Kumar Ojha
O R D E R
Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Rajnish Kumar Rai, Member (J)
Shri Ashish Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants is present.
Shri Krishna Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
2. By way of the instant O.A., the applicants have challenged the orders dated 19.11.2023, 01.12.2023 and 19.12.2023 vide which the respondents have passed the orders rejecting the representations of applicants for granting them financial up-gradation under MACP scheme w.e.f. their respective date of training. The applicants have prayed for the following relief(s): -
“(i) This Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned orders dated 19.11.2023, 01.12.2023 and 19.12.2023 passed by respondent No.2.
(ii) This Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the respondents to MANISH MEHROTRA revisit the grant of financial up-gradation under MACP scheme by counting the qualifying period of 10, 20 and 30 years from their initial date of joining i.e 06.05.1993 and according fixed their pay as per rule and pay differential amount along with admissible interest thereupon and they may be allowed MACP-II w.e.f. 06.05.2013 and MACP-III w.r.f. 06.05.2023.
(iii) Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case may be given in favour of the applicants. (iv) Award the costs of the original applica