Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Anjani Nandan Sharan, JJ
Gajanand Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through General Manager, North East Railway, Gorakhpur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the applicant's appointment and misconduct. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments raised by both applicant and respondents. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. limitations of judicial review in assessing penalties. (Para 9 , 14) |
| 4. observations on adherence to procedural rules in disciplinary matters. (Para 10 , 11 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. summary judgment dismissing the application. (Para 22 , 24) |
ORDER
By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial):-
Heard Shri Kali Kant , learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Anil , learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing of the case.
2. The instant Original Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act , 1985 has been filed for the following reliefs:
8.1 This Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned orders dated 25.06.2007, impugned Appellate Order dated 28.02.2008 and impugned Revisional order dated 04/05.10.2010 passed by respondents Nos.06, 5, and 2 respectively.
ii) This Hon’ble Court further be pleased to direct the respondents to restore the pay-scale of applicant with all consequential benefits.
(iii)That this Hon’ble Court may further be pleased to pass such other and/or further or
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
