CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Rajinder Kashyap, A
SH.SHASHI BHANU S – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for compassionate allowances under rule 41. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against granting compassionate allowance based on conviction. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's analysis of factors determining eligibility for compassionate allowance. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J):
In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:–
“(l) Quash and set aside the impugned Order dated 26/05/2023;
(2) Direct the Respondents to consider and fix the Compassionate allowance to the Applicant;
(3) Direct the Respondent No. 1 to pay arrears of compassionate allowances to be paid from 19/09/2013, the date of the Removal of the Applicant from service;
(4) Pass such other order as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”
2. Highlighting the facts of the case, learned counsel for the applicant submitted as under:
2.1. The impugned rejection of the applicant’s request for compassionate allowance is arbitrary, non-speaking and contrary to Rule 41 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021 and the settled law.
2.2 The applicant, who rendered year

Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.