Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Rajinder Kashyap, A
Jitten Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of criminal allegation against candidates. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against the response provided by the candidates. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's review and observation regarding the fairness in recruitment. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J): -
Since a common question of facts and law arises in the present O.A.s, they are being disposed of through this common order. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are being extracted from O.A. No. 68/2025 with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.
2. By way of the present O.A. filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: -
“(a) call for the records of the case and
(b) quash and set aside impugned order dated 22.11.2024 (Annexure A/1) along with show cause notice dated 16.10.2024 (Annexure A/2) and;
(c) direct the respondents to forthwith appoint the applicant to the post(s) in pay band 5200-20200 with Grade Pay Rs. 1800/- (pre-revised) pursuant to applicant’s selection towards the advertisement issued in the year 2014
(d) accord all consequential benefits including seniority and monetary benefits
(e) Award costs of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
