CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Rajinder Kashyap, A
Jitten Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J): -
Since a common question of facts and law arises in the present O.A.s, they are being disposed of through this common order. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are being extracted from O.A. No. 68/2025 with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.
2. By way of the present O.A. filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: -
“(a) call for the records of the case and
(b) quash and set aside impugned order dated 22.11.2024 (Annexure A/1) along with show cause notice dated 16.10.2024 (Annexure A/2) and;
(c) direct the respondents to forthwith appoint the applicant to the post(s) in pay band 5200-20200 with Grade Pay Rs. 1800/- (pre-revised) pursuant to applicant’s selection towards the advertisement issued in the year 2014
(d) accord all consequential benefits including seniority and monetary benefits
(e) Award costs of the proceedings; and
(f) Pass any order/relief/direction(s) as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the interests of justice in favour of the applicants.”
3. Highlighting the facts of the case, learned counsel for the applicant sub
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.