Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Judicial Member, Rajinder Kashyap, Administrative Member
Darshan Nagar – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Police through Commissioner of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants disqualified in arbitrary pe&mt race (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. demand fair opportunity without discrimination (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. pe&mt conducted uniformly; process completed (Para 5) |
| 4. no arbitrariness in race conduct established (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. post-recruitment interference unwarranted (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. oa dismissed; no merit in claims (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
O R D E R
Hon’ble Mr. RajinderKashyap, Member (A): -
By way of the present O.A. filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicants have prayed for the following reliefs: -
“(i) To call for the records of the case especially the video footage of the 1600 m race event held by the respondents on various dates between 13.01.2024 till 20.01.2024 for selection to the post of Constable (Exe) Male and Female;
(ii) Hold and declare manner in which the 1600 m race event was held by the respondents to be arbitrary and illegal and violative of set practices which were being followed by the respondents till date;
(iii) Consequently, quash and set aside the disqualification of the applicants herein from the PE&MT [1600m the race event] held by the respondents on various dat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
