SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 294

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Nidadavolu Vijaya Rama Raju – Appellant
Versus
Dept Of Posts – Respondent
O.A./297/2019



CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH, HYDERABAD ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.020/00297/2019 ORDER RESERVED ON 16.12.2025 DATE OF ORDER: 08.01.2026 HON’BLE DR. LATA BASWARAJ PATNE, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE MR. VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER NIDADAVOLU VIJAYA RAMA RAJU S/o. NIDADAVOLU PALLAM RAJU Aged 28 years, (for Group – Extra Departmental GDS Post) Gr.D R/o. 2-992, Tarakarama Nagar Parimpudi, Koyyalagudem West Godavari -534 312. …..Applicant (By Advocate: Sri B.Gurudas)

Vs.

1. Union of India Rep. by the Secretary Department of Posts & Chairperson Postal Services Board, Dak Bhavan New Delhi – 110 001.

2. The Chief Post Master General Andhra Pradesh Circle Krishnalanka Vijayawada – 520 013.

3. The Director, Postal Services (Hqrs)

Krishnalanka Vijayawada – 520 013.

4. The Superintendent of Post Offices Tadepalligudem Division Tadepalligudem -534 101. ….Respondents (By Advocate: Smt.B.Gayatri Varma, Sr.CGSC)

*****

O R D E R PER: HON’BLE MR. VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER

1. The present Original Application has been filed by the applicant under Section

19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief:

“Quash and set aside the impugned order dated 11.12.2018 issued arbitrarily without any speaking order by the respondents and direct the respondents to issue for further proceedings to the applicant for appointment to the post of GDS BPM under PH(HH) quota in the AP Circle.”

2. It is a very sketchy OA. The facts, as per the submission by the applicant, are given below:

i. The applicant had applied on 08.05.2018 for the post of GDS BPM, under the PH (HH) Quota, in response to the notification, vide No.RE/APCO/3-11/2018, dt.25.04.2018, of India Posts in the Andhra Pradesh Circle. The total number of posts advertised was 2286 under the Andhra Pradesh Circle. The applicant was allotted Registration No.R821F479323B4. He was selected and was at S.No.1465, as per the results notified, and allotted to the Tadepalligudem Division under Kovvur H.O., Devarapalli S.O. (West Godavari), for Bandapram B.O., for the post of GDS BPM, under the PH(HH) Quota, as per SMS message, on 19.07.2018. However, the applicant was not called for certificate verification. He made a representation, on 07.10.2018, to the 4th Respondent, requesting about further process. The 4th Respondent, vide his letter, dt.22.10.2018, informed the applicant that the issue of the post of GDS BPM, Bandapuram BO A/W Devarapalli SO, is being pursued with higher authorities. Then, the applicant made a representation to the 2nd Respondent, on 16.11.2018, requesting for issue of further proceedings. The 4th Respondent issued the impugned order on 11.12.2018, without any speaking order. Hence, the OA.

3. The applicant had also sought the interim relief as under:

“Pending disposal of the above Original Application, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Tribunal in the interests of justice, suspend the impugned order dated 11.12.2018 and direct the respondents to keep one post vacant under HH quota and pass such other and further order or orders as are deemed fit and proper by this Hon’ble Tribunal in the circumstances of the case.”

4. This Tribunal had issued interim order, on 28.03.2019, as follows –

“3. Learned counsel for the respondents has opposed for grant of interim relief on the ground that the appointing authority has right to cancel any notification and, therefore, the plea of the applicant need not be entertained. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant has pleaded that the applicant who is physically handicapped, has been provisionally selected. x x x x. ..........the plea of the learned counsel for the applicant is that, the applicant can be considered for any other post coming under the jurisdiction of the respondents. He has prayed for reserving one post under Physically Handicapped quota till the OA is decided.

4. In view of the facts stated above, respondents are directed to keep one post under Physically Handicapped

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top