Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member, Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member
ADHIP CHANDRA CHAUDHURI – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant challenges pension and gratuity withholding post-disciplinary inquiry. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicant's arguments: vague charges, no government loss, disproportionate penalty. (Para 3 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. respondents defend: charges proved, grave misconduct, upsc/cvc advice followed. (Para 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 4. tribunal upholds inquiry: simultaneous proceedings valid, punishment proportionate. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. oa dismissed; no interference warranted. (Para 17) |
O R D E R
Per Hon’ble Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member :
1. The applicant has filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, praying for the following relief(s) highlighting the facts of the case:
“i) Rescind, recall, withdraw and/or cancel or quash the charge memo dated 23.09.2004 and punishment order being Annexure-Al insofar as it directs:
(a) Withholding of 50% of monthly pension otherwise admissible on a permanent basis.
(b) Withholding of gratuity admissible on a permanent basis.
ii) Pay all the arrears in pension with effect from the date of retirement on 01.10.2004 (FN).
iii) Release the gratuity as admissible with appropriate interest there
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
