ORDER

(ORAL Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)

Since a common question of facts and law is involved in the present OAs, with the consent of all parties the OAs were being heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are being extracted primarily from O.A. No. 2082/2024 (Pinki v. Employees State Insurance sHitpicupta Corporation (ESIC) & Ors.) SHILPI GUPTA 2026.01.20

2. In the instant O.A. the applicants have prayed for the following reliefs:-

“(i) To quash and set-side the impugned order dated 15.02.2024. (Annexure A/I).

(ii) Direct the respondent to appoint the applicant on the post of Post of Cook/Cook mate with all consequential benefits.

(iii) To allow the OA with exemplary costs.

(iv) To pass any other orders as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts circumstances of the case.”

3. Highlighting the facts of the case, learned counsel for the applicants would submit that the applicants are aggrieved of the impugned notification dated 15.02.2024. The applicants were found of short of marks and not recommended for the appointment. The applicants’ name in O.A. No. 2082/2024 was at serial no. 10 in Haryana Zon