Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Jayesh V Bhairavia, J, Hukum Singh Meena, A
Mr.S. K. Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the applicant's case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court observations on the process followed in the inquiry. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. findings regarding the applicant's attendance and representation. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. legal validation of disciplinary decision-making process. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. jurisprudence on judicial review limits for disciplinary proceedings. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. final decision emphasizing lack of merit in the applicant's claims. (Para 15) |
ORDER
Per : Hon’ble Dr.Hukum Singh Meena, Member (A)
1. Being aggrieved by the Order No.221/3/2000-AVD.IIB dated 12.03.2014 by the Disciplinary Authority, the applicant has filed the present OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act , 1985 seeking following relief:-
“a) (A) Be Pleased to admit and allow this present application
(B) Be Pleased to Quash and Set aside the Impugned decision of dismissal, being Order No. 221/3/2000- AVD.II(B) dated 12/03/2014 (Annex. 1), alongwith the inquiry proceedings (Annexure-2) and the UPSC Advice(Annexure-3) based on which this order has come to be passed.
(C) Be pleased to direct the respondents to grant all consequential benefits to the present applicant which a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
