Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sunil Thomas, J, V. Rama Mathew, A
Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited – Appellant
Versus
V.K. Devarajan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of recovery against pension benefits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. verification of caste status and its impact. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. dispute over community certificate validity. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. rights to pension depend on legal appointment. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. non-compliance of tribunal orders leads to contempt actions. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. response to disciplinary actions after vrs. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. judicial review of proceedings and past actions. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. disciplinary proceedings legality post-retirement. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 9. reliance on previous judicial decrees for caste status. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 10. consequences stemming from employment based on caste certificate. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 11. charges based on false certificates discussed. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 12. previous rulings on caste certificates and employment rights. (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 13. judicial protection of pension rights versus misconduct. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 14. entitlements and obligations regarding terminal benefits. (Para 45 , 46) |
| 15. final orders to disburse benefits and close proceedings. (Para 47 , 48) |
ORDER
Per: Justice Sunil Thomas, Judicial Member
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
