SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 386

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sumit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
M/o Railways – Respondent


Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench: New Delhi O.A. No.1996/2024 This the 12th day of January, 2026 Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)

Hon’ble Dr. Anand S Khati, Member (A)

Sumit Kumar S/o Sh. Rambhrosa, (Roll No 174194170018920 ) age 24 years, R/O ViII. & Post-

LILON, Tehsil ,Shamli U.P -247776 …Applicant (By Advocate: Mr. B K Barera)

Versus

1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Railway, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi

2. The Chairman, Railway Recruitment Board Cell, Lajpat Nagar-I, New Delhi-24

3 General Manager, Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi …Respondents (By Advocates : Mr. Awanish Kumar with Mr. Ajay Sharma)

ORDER (ORAL)

By Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)

In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant seeks the following reliefs:-

“(a) to quash the notice dated 02-02-2024 issued to the Applicant (PWBD) informing him that D.V Committee during documents verification found the online application filed is not in consonance with the documents produced.

(b) direction to respondents to Consider the case of the Applicant in accordance with the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 giving the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top