Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rameshwar Vyas, J, Amit Sahai, A
R.K Bothra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of applicant's retirement basis. (Para 2) |
| 2. court’s perspective on judicial review concerning retirement. (Para 3 , 9) |
| 3. rationale for upholding the compulsory retirement under public interest. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. arguments against the retirement process and charges. (Para 6) |
ORDER
Per Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rameshwar Vyas, Member (J)
Being aggrieved by order dated 25.11.2019 (Annexure-A/2) retiring the applicant under clause (j) of Rule 56 of the Fundamental Rules, as also the order dated 14.07.2020 (Annexure-A/1) whereby appropriate authority while accepting the recommendation of the Representation Committee rejected the representation filed by the applicant against the order of compulsory retirement, the applicant has preferred this OA to quash and set aside the above orders with consequential benefits.
2. Facts of the case in brief are as under:-
2.1 The applicant was appointed as Inspector of Income Tax on 25.01.1989 and was promoted to the post of Income Tax Officer on 22.10.2002. The Review Committee held the meeting to review the cases of compulsory retirement. The Review Committee was assisted by the Internal Committee. The Review Committee discussed the gui
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
