ORDER

Per Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rameshwar Vyas, Member (J)

Being aggrieved by order dated 25.11.2019 (Annexure-A/2) retiring the applicant under clause (j) of Rule 56 of the Fundamental Rules, as also the order dated 14.07.2020 (Annexure-A/1) whereby appropriate authority while accepting the recommendation of the Representation Committee rejected the representation filed by the applicant against the order of compulsory retirement, the applicant has preferred this OA to quash and set aside the above orders with consequential benefits.

2. Facts of the case in brief are as under:-

2.1 The applicant was appointed as Inspector of Income Tax on 25.01.1989 and was promoted to the post of Income Tax Officer on 22.10.2002. The Review Committee held the meeting to review the cases of compulsory retirement. The Review Committee was assisted by the Internal Committee. The Review Committee discussed the guidelines and considering various aspects of each of the officers, it was of the opinion that inter alia Rajendra Kumar Bothra is fit case for compulsory retirement under FR 56 (j). The Committee noted three charge sheets against the applicant issued on 04.08.2017, 05.09.2018 and 13.03.2019 respectiv