Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R.N. Singh, J, B. Anand, A
Mr. Manjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identification of issues in combined oas (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. procedural reliance on expert opinion challenges (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. evidentiary standards in departmental inquiry (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. final orders regarding charge sheets and benefits (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. R.N. Singh, Member (J)
We have heard the learned counsels for the parties and with their assistance, we have also perused the pleadings available on record.
2. It is undisputed that the issue involved in all the captioned OAs is identical. It is also undisputed that all the applicants are similarly placed and in this background the OAs were clubbed and listed today for consideration and disposal. With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, OA No. 1317/2023 is taken as the lead case.
3. It is undisputed that the applicant had applied for the post of Sorting Assistant/Postal Assistant against the advertisement for Direct Recruitment Examination 2011-12 conducted by the Delhi Postal Circle. The applicant applied and participated in the said examination and was declared qualified on the basis of result of the said examination. Offer of appointment was issued to hi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
