Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R.N. Singh, J, B. Anand, A
Kushal Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary M/o communications & IT Deptt. of Post – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant challenges termination based on procedural violations. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. responses to applicant's claims and allegations of misconduct. (Para 4 , 5 , 10) |
| 3. court emphasizes need for inquiry in stigmatic terminations. (Para 11) |
| 4. court quashes termination and orders reinstatement. (Para 12) |
ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. R.N. Singh, Member (J)
1. We have heard the learned counsels for the parties. With their assistance we have also perused the pleadings available on record.
2. In the present O.A., the applicant has challenged the order dated 01.04.2024 vide which the respondents have terminated the services of the applicant by invoking the provisions of Sub Rule 1 of Rule 5 of the CCS (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965, forthwith.
3. In the present O.A. the applicant has prayed for the following relief(s):-
(a) Directing the respondents to place the relevant records pertaining to the present O.A. before the Hon'ble Tribunal for the proper adjudication in the matter.
(b) Quash and setting aside the impugned termination order dt. 01.04.24 (Annexure A/1) after declaring the same is as illegal, biased, perverse, unjust, arbitrary, malafide, unconstitutional, against the princi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
