Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Judicial Member, Anjani Nandan Sharan, Administrative Member
Mangal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tribunal composition and preliminary remarks. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. overview of applicants' claims concerning pension eligibility based on hiring practices. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. counterarguments from the respondents regarding pension coverage. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. arguments advocating for applicants' claims regarding recruitment initiation. (Para 8) |
| 5. respondents' defense against applicants' pension entitlement claims. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. court's analysis of relevant provisions and precedents. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. court's decision reaffirming pension eligibility based on recruitment date. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 8. imposition of judicial discipline in coordinating decisions. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 9. final conclusion and directive regarding the case outcome. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
ORDER
By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial):-
Though the matter was heard along with O.A. No.748/2022, but for better appreciation of the matter, the case is being disposed of separately.
2. Heard Shri S.J. Ishtiaque, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Vinod Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing.
Reliefs sought by the applicants:-
3. The instant Original Applicatio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
