Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash, J, Mohan Pyare, A
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the applicant's challenge to the upsc order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the maintainability based on online application submissions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's examination of jurisdictional rules and relevant case law. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final determination regarding the dismissal of the application. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER
(By Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (Judicial)
Shri Prateek Sinha, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajni Kant Rai and Shri R K Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents, were present at the time of hearing.
2. The instant original application has been filed by the applicant seeking following relief:
“(i) This Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to quash and set aside the Impugned order dated 23.04.2025 passed by Union Public Service Commission.
(ii) This Hon’ble Tribunal may further be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the candidature of applicant on the post of Deputy Superintendent Archaeologist, in Archaeological Survey of India, Ministry of Culture and further to re-consider the case of applicant in the light of his experience certificate and supporting documents.
(iii) This Hon’ble T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
