Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, J, Mohan Pyare, A
Usha Meena – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through General Manager, North Eastern Railway – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant successfully passed various stages of recruitment but faced discrepancies. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. respondents argued rejection was justified based on discrepancies in documents. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court rejected discrepancy claims citing common societal practices regarding name prefixes. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER
(By Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (Judicial)
Shri Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri K P Singh, learned counsel for the respondents, were present at the time of hearing.
2. The instant original application has been filed by the applicant seeking following relief:
“(i) To issue an order or direction in the suitable nature quashing the orders impugned dated 16.10.2024 and 26.03.2024 passed by respondent no. 2 (Annexure No. A-1 to this O.A.) with compilation No. I.
(ii) To issue an order or direction, in the suitable nature, directing the respondent department to issue the panel list against the notified post of Chief Law Assistant for the ST category pursuant to notification dated 23.02.2019 and further direct the respondent no issue an offer of an appointment to the applicant within stipulated period of time which may specified by
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
