Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Anand S Khati, A
K.R.Joshi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants seek nfu from sag to hag w.e.f. 2007. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. nfu governed by prevailing rrs requiring 3 years sag service. (Para 4) |
| 3. 6th cpc parity not diluted by rrs or office instructions. (Para 5) |
| 4. nfu conditional on contemporaneous eligibility norms despite ias dates. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. oas dismissed; nfu w.e.f. 03.12.2009 upheld. (Para 15) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Dr. Anand S. Khati, Member (A)
Since a common question of facts and law arises in the present O.As., we have heard both the OAs together and they are being disposed of by this common order. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are primarily being extracted from O.A. No. 3905/2015 being the lead case, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The O.A. No. 3905/2015 has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following reliefs:-
“a) quash and set aside the impugned letter dated 10-03-2015 informing the Applicant that he does not qualify for grant of NFU from SAG to HAG.
b) directions to the respondents to grant the Applicant Non functional upgradation from SAG to HAG w.e.f. 26-12- 2007, the due date,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
