CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Anand S. Khati, A
Rajendra Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police, Delhi Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of candidate's legal issues and application for appointment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents' criteria and legal justifications for non-appointment. (Para 3) |
| 3. assessment criteria laid down for candidate's suitability regarding criminal antecedents. (Para 5) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
In the present O.A. filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:-
“(i) Direct the Respondents to set aside and quash order dated 04.11.2024 and grant appointment to the Applicant w.e.f. the date when others who had participated in the examination and succeeded, were granted appointment;
(ii) Direct the Respondents to award all consequential benefits, including back wages, continuity of service, seniority, arrears of pay, fixation of pay at par with other similarly placed, to the Applicant; and
(iii) Any other or further order as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit.”
2. Highlighting the facts of the case, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is a duly selected candidate for the post of Constable (Exe.) Male, who successfully cleared all stages of the recruitment process
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.