Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Anand S. Khati, A
Sunil Kumar Verma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Through Secretary (Home) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the applicant seeks relief due to wrongful rejection of candidature. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents assert compliance with screening processes for assessing candidate's suitability. (Para 3) |
| 3. judicial review of processes and standards applicable in assessing candidate's suitability. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
In the present O.A. filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:-
“A. Call for records of the case;
B. Quash and set aside the impugned order dated 06/12/2024,
C. Direct the Respondents to appoint the Applicant in the post of Constable (Driver) under SC category with all consequential benefits including arrears of pay, seniority, increment etc;
D. Award cost of the proceedings: and
E. Pass any order/relief/direction(s) as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice in favour of the Applicant.”
2. Highlighting the facts of the case, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant, a meritorious candidate, duly qualified in all stages of the selection process, including the Computer Based Examination, PET/PST/Trade Test and m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
