SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 549

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Anand S Khati, A
Sadhu Sharan Patel – Appellant
Versus
Union Public Service Commission – Respondent
O.A. No. 3618/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. K C Mittal, Mr. Gautam Buddha Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Jalaj Aggarwal, Mr. R V Sinha, Ms. Shriya Sharma, Ms. Jyoti Garg

Candidates cannot claim a right for a reserve list unless it is mandated by specific rules or advertisement.

Headnote:The judgment concerns an Original Application where the petitioners sought a declaration regarding the marks obtained and the preparation of a reserve list following the recruitment for the post of Examiner of Trade Marks. The court discussed the necessity and conditions under which a reserve list should be maintained in accordance with an Office Memorandum dated 13.06.2000. The court concluded that since there was no specific provision mandating a reserve list, and due to the absence of requisite contingencies, the application was dismissed, affirming the respondents' decision to not prepare such a list and denying any resulting rights.

Table of Content
1. preservation of the fundamentals of recruitment law. (Para 1 , 2)
2. application integrity against arbitrary actions within recruitment. (Para 3)
3. legal implications of reserve lists in appointments. (Para 6)
4. conclusion reached on the validity of non-preparation of a reserve list. (Para 7)

ORDER

Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)

By way of the present O.A. the applicants have prayed for the following reliefs:-

"a) Allow this application and direct the respondent no. 1 to declare the marks of the Applicants herein and publish the reserve list as per merit accordingly;

b) Direct the respondents consider the candidature of the herein Applicants for appointment to the post of Examiner of Trade Marks and Geographical Indications, as per law, subject to them being found on reserve list so declared by respondent no. 1 in order of merit against the vacancies which have already arisen in the Trademark and Geographical Indications Registry.

c) Pass such other order/direction (s) which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, proper and necessary in the interest of justice."

2. Highlighting the facts of the present case, learned counsel for the applicants submitted that an Advertisement No. 15/2019 was issued by the respondents, whereby 65 vacancies for the post of Examiner of Trade Marks and Geographical Indications were issued. The result of the aforesaid advertisement was declared on 14.05.2020. Out of 232 candidates the respondents recommended 62 candidates for the aforesaid posts. Two vacancies were left vacant due to reason of non-availability of suitable candidates and also the result of one seat was put in a sealed cover pursuant to the interim order of Mumbai Bench of this Tribunal for keeping the result in sealed cover, subject to the outcome of OA. Nos. 786/2019, 789/2019, 790/2019, 791/2019, 793/2019.

2.1 Learned counsel submitted that it is the case of the applicants that the reserve result was not published or declared by the respondents. Hence, the present O.A. has been filed by the applicants seeking aforementioned reliefs.

2.2 Learned counsel for the applicants relied upon the O.M. dated 13.06.2000 issued by the Govt. of India, M/o PPG and Pensions, DoP&T, which reads as under:-

“Sub: Operation of reserve panel is prepared on the basis of selections made by UPSC, Staff Selection Commission, other recruiting agencies and where selections are made by Ministries/Department etc. – acceptance of recommendations of Fifth Central Pay Commission – regarding.

The undersigned is directed to invite attention to this Department’s Office Memorandum quoted in the margin and to say that In terms of these Office Memorandum, it was informed that the Union Public Service Commission, wherever possible, maintains a reserve panel of candidates found suitable on the basis of selections made by them for appointment on direct recruitment, transfer on deputation, transfer basis and the reserve panel is operated by the UPSC on a request received from the Ministry / Department concerned when the candidate recommended by the UPSC either does not join, thereby causing a replacement vacancy or he joins but resigns or dies within six months of his joining. Ministries/Departments were advised that whenever such a contingency arises, they should first approach the UPSC for nomination of a candidate from the reserve panel, if any. The recruitment process be treated as completed only after hearing from the UPSC and the Ministry/Department concerned may resort to any thereafter.

2. The Fifth Central Pay Commission, in para 17.11 of its Report, has recommended that with a view to reduce delay in filling up of the posts, vacancies resulting from resignation or death of an incumbent within one year of his appointment should be filled immediately by the candidate from the reserve panel , if a fresh panel is not available by then. Such a vacancy should not be treated as a fresh vacancy. This recommendation has been examined in consultation with the UPSC and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top