Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Narendra Kumar Johari, J, Kumar Rajesh Chandra, A
Vigan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary, Railway Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details the applicant's initial appointment and grounds for dismissal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. summarizes arguments regarding procedural violations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. examines the judicial process and rights under employment. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. discusses the legal standards set for termination. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. concludes with the ruling and final directives. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
ORDER
Per Justice Narendra Kumar Johari, Member (J) :-
Present OA has been filed by the applicant for the following relief:-
“(1. To quash the Letter No-687 dated 20.8.2016 contained in Annexure- A-9 as well as Letter No- 5/1-5/settlement/Singh dated 28.9.2016 contained in Annexure- 10 of the application which was passed against the Article- 14, 21 and 311(2) of the Constitution of India and in violation of Rules of natural justice.
ii. To reinstate the service of the applicant with effect from the date of removal from service i.e. 3-10-2016 with all consequential benefits.
iii. To direct the respondent not to file any criminal case against the applicant on the basis of ex parte decision taken by the respondent.
iv. To q
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
