Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Narendra Kumar Johri, J, Kumar Rajesh Chandra, A
Jitendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's selection and caste certificate verification issues. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. central ministry opinions rejecting sc status for tatwa caste. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. applicant's arguments citing state judgments and equality. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 4. recap of facts and prior tribunal directions. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. central sc list governs; tatwa not included per article 341. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. state judgments inapplicable; oa dismissed. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
O R D E R
Per- JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JOHRI, MEMBER [J]
1.Instant Original Application has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief(s):
“8.1 The rejection order dated 26th Dec 2018 issued by Dy. Director for Chairman, DRDO (Ann-A/6) be quashed.
8.2 The Respondents be directed not to give effect to the rejection order dated 26th Dec 2018 and to reconsider the case of this petitioner for his appointment on the selected post on and from the date of appointment of the 1st candidate lower to the petitioner in the recommended list of the UPSC with all consequential benefits.
8.3 The Respondents be directed to issue appointment letter to the petitione
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
