Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ranjit More, Chairman, RajinderKashyap, Member (A)
Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's distinguished service record and achievements (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. impugned charge memo and tribunal stay (Para 4) |
| 3. applicant's arguments on mala fides and natural justice (Para 6) |
| 4. respondents' defence on independent misconduct charges (Para 7) |
| 5. judicial restraint on charge sheet interference (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. overreaching tribunal stay constitutes abuse of process (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. charge memo invalid without witness list (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 8. quashing charge memo for procedural violations (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
O R D E R Hon’ble Mr. RajinderKashyap, Member (A):
By filing the instant OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant is seeking the following prayers:-
"a) Quash and set aside the impugned Charge Memorandum No.
30/2025 dated 18.08.2025 issued to the Applicant;
b) Restrain the Respondents from proceeding further in pursuance of the impugned Charge Memorandum dated 18.08.2025 during the pendency of the present Original Application;
c) Pass any other or further order(s) as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice."
FACTS OF THE CA
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
