Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash, J, Mohan Pyare, A
Ravi Pratap Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through The General Manager, North Eastern Railway – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis for the disciplinary action. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the penalties and administrative actions taken. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding the legality of charges and penalties. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. disciplinary authorities' findings and contents of appeals. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. judicial review standards and limitations on disciplinary actions. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. role of the tribunal in evaluating disciplinary proceedings. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. constitutional and statutory principles regarding disciplinary actions. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. final dismissal of the application. (Para 23) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Mr. Mohan Pyare, Member (A)
Present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, seeking the following relief:
“8.1 That the Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to set-aside/quash Penalty Order dated 25-05-2005 passed by the Divisional Commercial Manager, North Eastern Railway, Varanasi (Respondent No.4) imposed penalty of ‘Reduction in rank from pay scale Rs.4000-6000, basic pay Rs.4200/- to pay scale Rs.3200-4900 with basic pay Rs. 3200/- for four years permanently with cumulative ef
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
