Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajnish Kumar Rai, J, Manju Pandey, A
D.K. Guha Roy – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the applicant contested disciplinary measures on grounds of jurisdiction. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents defended actions citing applicant's misconduct. (Para 4 , 7) |
| 3. court emphasized jurisdiction and proper authority in procedural proceedings. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court quashed the penalties due to procedural violations. (Para 16 , 17) |
ORDER
Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Rajnish Kumar Rai, Member (J)
Shri Ajay Rajendra, learned counsel for the applicant is present.
Shri Raghvendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
2. By way of the instant O.A., the applicant has challenged the order dated 02.09.2019 passed by respondent No. 2 imposing the penalty off compulsory retirement on the applicant from service at Process-Cum- Product Development Centre, Meerut with retrospective effect from 05.12.2001 as well as the entire proceedings included the minutes of 44th meeting of the Governing Council, PPDC, Meerut dated 07.03.2019. The applicant has prayed for the following relief(s): -
“(i) to issue a suitable order or direction quashing the impugned order dated 02.09.2019 passed by respondent no. 4 imposing penalty of compulsory retirement on the applicant fr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
