Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajnish Kumar Rai, J
Smt. Gyabati – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Communication & I.T. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant seeks benefits after husband's death. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. established rights of temporary employees for pension. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court orders payment of pensionary benefits. (Para 21 , 22) |
ORDER
Shri Vinay Kumar Gupta, counsel for the applicant and Shri Manoj Kumar Sharma, counsel for the respondents are present and heard.
2. By the instant O.A. the applicant has prayed for following relief(s):
-
“I. To set aside the impugned order no. Pension -1/P-I/ViVidh/Late Baladin/23-2/D-571 dated 13.10.2023 passed by respondent No. 4 with direction to the respondents to pay arrears of family pension since 01.12.2013, month to month family pension, death gratuity and other benefits with 18% interest till date of actual payment, admissible under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, and according to the identical judgments (Annexure no. A 6, 10 to 17).
II. to issue direction to pay GPF amount deducted (Annexure no. A-6) from her husband salary with interest which is fixed time to time under rules.
III. deleted by Court’s Order dated 16.01.2026.
IV. To issue any other direction to the respondents to which this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in view of facts and circumstance
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
