SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 659

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Pramod Kumar Das, Member (A)
Trilochan Debata – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: J.Pal

Table of Content
1. promotion governed by 1966 regulations procedures. (Para 1 , 2)
2. applicant's provisional selection despite disciplinary proceedings. (Para 3 , 5 , 12)
3. select list validity and state/upsc roles. (Para 4 , 6)
4. precedents mandate notional promotion for parity. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13)
5. notional promotion ordered with consequential benefits. (Para 14 , 15)

Mr. J.Pal, Counsel for State PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A):

It may be noted that promotion from State Forest Service (SFS) to Indian Forest Service (IFS) is governed by Indian Forest Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1966 [in short Regulations, 1966]. In the said Regulations, 1966, the procedure for promotion to IFS like, determination of vacancies for a particular select year, preparation of forwarding of proposal by concerned State Govt. to UPSC, holding of Selection Committee Meeting by UPSC, Concurrence of Minutes, notification of select list approved by the UPSC, formal proposal for concerned State Govt. for appointment of IFS and issue of appointment have been dealt into.

2. Admittedly, in exercise of the powers contained in Sub Regulation 3 of Regulation 7, the UPSC approved the select list

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top