Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Narendra Kumar Johari, J, Kumar Rajesh Chandra, A
Dhirendra Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Director General, Directorate of Mines and Safety – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant challenges damage rent deductions from retirement benefits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents justify damage rent under dgms rules and fr 45-a. (Para 3) |
| 3. hearing and arguments reviewed with cited precedents. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. damage calculation valid under service rules post-eviction. (Para 7) |
| 5. oa dismissed as misconceived. (Para 8) |
O R D E R
1.Per Kumar Rajesh Chandra, A.M.:-This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:-
“(a) To quash the No Objection Certificate dated 10.06.2021 issued from the office of GDMS, Dhanbad wherein the amount of damage rent against retention of official accommodation by the applicant for unauthorized period from 30.06.1997 to 31.03.2021 has been calculated at Rs. 9,66,380/-.
(ii) To quash the letter nos. 1829 and 1831 both dated 28.03.2022 issued from the office of DGMS, Dhanbad to the Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Directorate of DGMS, Dhanbad whereby and whereunder an amount of Rs. 28,272/- and an amount of Rs. 9,55,800/- (Nine lakhs Fifty Five thousands eight hundred only) has to be sought to be deducted from the amounts of gratuity and pension respectively of the applicant.
(iii) To quash the letter no.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
