SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 710

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Narendra Kumar Johari, J, Kumar Rajesh Chandra, A
Rajiv Prasad, Amit Kumar, Anil Kumar Das, Ranjit Kumar, Ashok Kumar, Ritesh Kumar, Rahul Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India Through the Director General, National Institute of Fashion Technology – Respondent
O.A./050/00634/2021 | M.A. No. 644/2021 | M.A. No.51 of 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri M.P. Dixit
For the Respondents: Shri T.N. Thakur, ld. Sr. CGSC

Court mandated regularization of long-serving temporary employees, emphasizing protection against arbitrary outsourcing in public service, reinforcing legal employment standards.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21 & 311 - Regularization of employees - Applicants appointed as MTS through a placement agency claim regularization after working for years without adverse remarks. Respondents attempt to shift positions to outsourcing. Court held previous orders invalid and mandated regularization, emphasizing lawful employment standards. (Paras 1, 10, 41)

(B) Employment Law - Court emphasized legal safeguards against arbitrary outsourcing practices, upholding employees’ rights to regularization and continuity in employment when performing integral roles. (Paras 40, 41)

Facts of the case:
Applicants, initially hired through placement agencies from 2009-2016 as MTS, sought regular employment status against sanctioned posts over concern of outsourcing jobs, alleging discrimination.

Findings of Court:
Court ruled to stop the outsourcing practice and granted regularization to applicants, ensuring fair employment rights for long-serving employees.

Issues: Validity of the outsourcing decision, and equal treatment of long-term employees against favorable decisions made in other cases.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled against the practice of outsourcing for positions held by long-serving employees and mandated their regularization due to continuous service under sanctioned posts. This ruling illustrates the commitment to uphold employee rights under constitutional provisions.

Result: O.A. was allowed, with a direction for regularization mandated.

Table of Content
1. summary of case initiation and relief requests made by applicants. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details regarding the employment history and conditions of the applicants, including extensions and service performance. (Para 8 , 10 , 12)
3. discussion on the outsourcing policy and its impact on the applicants' employment. (Para 19 , 20 , 24)
4. court's perspectives on the legality of the applicants' employment status and the necessity for ongoing rights. (Para 30 , 40)
5. final decision directed towards the regularization of the applicants' employment. (Para 41 , 42)

ORDER

Per Justice Narendra Kumar Johari, Member (J) :-

Present O.A.has been filed by the applicants for the following reliefs:-

“8.1. That your Lordships may graciously be pleased to quash and set aside the Office Memorandum dated 08.07.2021 as contained in Annexure A/1 particularly with respect to shifting of 17 sanctioned posts of MTS to be manned though Outsourcing which is in detrimental to the interest/right of applicants.

8.2. That your Lordships may further be pleased to direct/command the respondents to absorb/regularize the services of applicants on the sanctioned posts of MTS against which they have been appointed and working.

8.3. That Respondents be further directed to allow the applicants to work against their respective posts till they are finally absorbed/regularized in service under the Respondents.

8.4 That the Respondents be further directed to grant all consequential benefit in favour of the Applicants for which they are legally entitled too.

8.5 Any other relief or reliefs including the cost of the proceeding may be allowed in favour of the Applicants.”

2. The factual matrix as argued by learned counsel for the applicants is that they were initially engaged/appointed against their respective posts in between 2009 to 2016 through Placement Agency. They are now working under the Opposite Party No..4.

3. That the respondent authorities approved the proposal of creation of 29 additional administrative posts at National Institute of fashion Technology (NIFT), Patna Campus on recommendation by the Standing Committee which was communicated by the Opposite Party No.3 through letter No.NIFT/HO/Estt.II/Creation of Posts/2014 dated 14.01.2016 to the NIFT, Patna Campus.

4. Thereafter, the Opposite Party No.4 has issued letter dated 02.02.2017 (Annexure-A/2) soliciting permission of the competent authority i.e. Director General, NIFT, New Delhi to all the NIFT, Patna to have ad-hoc appointments for the vacant Group-C Posts. Thereafter, Opposite Party No.1 has accorded approval for the same vide letter dated 20.03.2017. (Annexure-A/3).

5. It is also stated by the applicants that the competent authority, the Opposite Party No.5 has issued one Office Memorandum dated 21.07.2017 whereby all Head of the Departments were requested to fill the Performance Appraisal of employees engaged through Placement Agency, working in NIFT, Patna and to forward it up to 24.07.2017. (Annexure-A/4).

6. It is further stated by the counsel for applicants that vide Office Memorandum dated 21.08.2017, a Screening Committee comprising 04 Group-A officers was constituted and Committee was directed to submit its report for recommendation of names of candidate who fulfill the R.R.S. and can be considered for Ad-hoc appointment on various sanctioned posts. (Annexure-A/5). Screening Committee was held on 21.08.2017 and recommended 28 persons including the applicants. (Annexure-A/6).

7. That the competent authority has issued appointment letter dated 29.08.2017 for appointing the applicants against short Term basis on consolidated salary initially for six months from the date of joining or till the posts is filled by regular incumbent or until further orders, whichever is earlier with further condition that they will govern with Central Civil Service (Conduct) Rules. It is further stated that after their appointment, applicants joined against the post of MTS on 01.09.2017 and posted vide order dated 04

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top