SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 771

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shyam Lal Meena – Appellant
Versus
M/o Finance – Respondent


ORDER

Per : Shri Krishna, Member (A)

1.The applicant has filed this O.A. under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 to claim the following reliefs:-

“a) This Hon'ble Tribunal will be pleased to call for the records and proceedings which led to the passing of the impugned Orders i.e.

(i) | Impugned Order dated 3.6.2016, i.e. Annx. “A1”,

(ii) Impugned Order dated 31.08.2016 i.e. Annx.

(iii) | Impugned Departmental Rules of 1998 only to the extent it denied the benefit of OM dated 23.12.1970, i.e. Annx. “A3”, and Hemant Anant: Mahabal

(iv) Impugned Promotion Order dated 09.04.2002 (Recruitment Year: 2000-2001 (only to the extent of Applicants non-consideration), i.e. Annx. “A4’,

and after going through its proprietary, legality and constitutional validity be pleased to quash and set aside the same with full consequential benefits.

b) — This Hon'ble Tribunal will be pleased to hold and declare that in view of the judgment in the case of Rohtas Bhankhar and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Anr. Dated 15.07.2014 the Applicant is entitled to the Concessional Passing Standard and accordingly direct the respondents to modify the result of the applicant for the year 1999 of the Income-Tax

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top