CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Rajinder Kashyap, A
Vandana – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board – Respondent
ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
In the instant O.A. the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:-
“8. I. Allow the present Original Application; and
II. Quash the impugned Notice dated 10.06.2021. bearing No. F. NO. 236/Result/Asstt. Teacher (Nursery)/lnt. Cell/DSSSB/2019-2020 / 1581-90 as well as the Order dated 30.09.2021 whereby the candidature for the post of Assistant Teacher (Nursery) against OBC category was rejected; and
III. To the direct the Respondent to take time bound steps to consider the candidature of the applicant for the post of Assistant Teacher (Nursery) against OBC category; and
IV. Pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Highlighting the facts of the present case, learned counsel for the applicant draws attention to impugned order dated 30.09.2021 passed by the respondents. He highlights para 5 and 6 of the said order, which reads as under:-
“5. Further when the merit in each category became lower, she was given 10 days 1st opportunity w.e.f. 25.05.2021 to 03.06.2021 to upload 'OBC (Deihl) certificate vicle which her caste is recognized as backward class under Govt. of Delhi v
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.