CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, J, Sumeet Jerath, A
Saurabh Rana, Kumar Kantesh, Sachin Kumar Meena, Preetam Singh Meena, Deepak Kumar, John Lalnunsang – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Comptroller and Auditor General of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disruption in sas examination due to examination schedule failure. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. changes in examination structure impose unfair burdens on probationers. (Para 10 , 11 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. mid-probation changes to syllabus violate principles of procedural fairness. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. court grants one-time opportunity under established examination framework. (Para 33 , 34 , 36 , 37) |
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI OA No.3745/2025 with MA No.4227/2025 Reserved on: 21.01.2026 Pronounced on: 27.01.2026 Hon’ble Ms. Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member (J)
Hon’ble Dr. Sumeet Jerath, Member (A)
1. Saurabh Rana, S/o Sh. Samunder, R/o H.No.233, Sangeeth Nagar, Thycaud, Trivandrum, Kerala-695014 Designator: Assistant Audit Officer (Probationer) (Aged about 27 years)
2. Kumar Kantesh, S/o Sh. Awadh Kishor Singh, R/o 5E 505 Provident Sunworth Apartment, Kengeri, Bengaluru-560060 Designation- Assistant Audit Officer (Probationer) (Aged about 36 years)
3. Sachin Kumar Meena, S/o Sh. Ram Charan Lal Meena, r/o Flat No.40B, Leisure Valley Apartment, Society Faridabad, Sec-46, Haryana-121001 Designation- Assistant Audit Officer (Probationer) (Aged about 3
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.