CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajnish Kumar Rai, J, Manju Pandey, A
Mukesh Meena – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. timeliness in disciplinary action is essential. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. charge sheets must be issued timely, failure leads to quashing. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. simultaneous proceedings can occur, but with procedural integrity. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court emphasizes the need for efficient inquiry resolutions. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER
Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Rajnish Kumar Rai, Member (J)
Shri Satya Prakash Rai, counsel for the applicant and Shri Manoj Kumar Sharma, counsel for the respondents are present and heard.
2. By way of the instant O.A. the applicant has challenged the order charge sheet dated 09.12.2020 issued by the Under Secretary to the Government of India. The applicant has prayed for the following relief(s):
-
“8.1. to allow the present application;
8.2. to quash and set aside Major Penalty Charge Sheet dated 09.12.20200 [Annexure : A-1] issued to the Applicant as being bad in law;
Or, alternatively;
8.3. to declare that the Major Penalty Charge Sheet dated 09.12.2020 [Annexure: A-1] issued to the Applicant has lapsed;
8.4. to grant all consequential benefits to the Applicant as permissible in law;
8.5. to direct the Respondents to pay suitable compensation to the Applicant as this Ho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.