##PAGE1##

1

290/00093/2019

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR

Original Application No. 290/00093/2019

Pronounced on : 28.01.2026

Reserved on : 25.11.2025

CORAM

HON’BLE Mr JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS, MEMBER (J)

HON’BLE Dr AMIT SAHAI, MEMBER (A)

Satyandra Kumar son of Shri Gupteshwar Prasad, aged about 43

years, resident of Qtr. No. 2000-A, Diyatra Road Railway Colony,

NWR, Distt. Bikaner, last employed on the post of Station Master

at Diyatra Road Railway Station in Kolayat Phalodi Section, NWR.

......Applicant

By Advocate : Mr S.K. Malik.

Versus

1. Union of India through General Manager, North-Western

Railway, HQrs. Jaipur Zone, Near Jawahar Circle, Jaipur

Pin: 302017.

2. Senior Divisional Operating Manager, North Western

Railway, Bikaner.

3. Chief Medical Superintendent, North Western Railway,

Bikaner.

4. Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, NWR, Bikaner Division,

Bikaner.

5. Additional Divisional Railway Manager, NWR, Bikaner

Division, Bikaner.

......Respondents

By Advocate : Mr Rameshwar Dave.

Digitaly signed by SUDESH SHAKHI

SUDESH DN: C=IN, O=CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE

T a2R 7IB c6U eN 3A bL 7,

0

O 87U 1= 6J 2O 53D 4H 8P f2U aR

3

cB 0E c5N 5C cH 74, 5P eh 5o an 5e 3=

9aa4870d

b2699074ca1c35d078c, PostalCode=342006, S=

Rajasthan, SERIALNUMBER=

F709B6DE94E2153CCFD55F34387F3BB788E0FF850

SHAKHI A83262E2D1BB72EA7ADF651, CN=SUDESH

SHAKHI

Reason: I am the author of this document

Location:

Date: 2026.01.29 16:00:28+05'30'

Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2025.1.0

2

290/00093/2019

ORDER

Per : Hon’ble Mr Justice Rameshwar Vyas

Being aggrieved by the termination order dated

26.04.2017 (Annex. A/1) whereby the applicant’s services has

been terminated under Para 512 sub note 2 (ii) of IRMM 2000

from the post of Assistant Station Master (ASM), the applicant

has preferred this OA to quash and set aside the above order as

also the order of appellate authority dated 21.02.2019 (Annex.

A/3) rejecting the appeal filed by the applicant.

2. The facts necessary to adjudicate this OA are as under:-

2.1 The applicant was initially appointed to the post of ASM on

20.12.2012. He was subjected to the medical examination and

found fit in Aye Two (A-2) category.

2.2 While posted at Diyatara Road Railway Station Kolayat

Phalodi Section, he was sent for a periodical medical

examination held on 06.06.2016. As per medical certificate

(Annex. A/4), advice was made to keep him in sick list for the

illness of defective colour vision; he was issued a sick certificate

for 30 days on 08.06.2016 (Annex. A/5).

2.3 Since he was found having defective colour vision, he was

referred to Sr. D.M.O. (Ophthalmology) Jaipur. He was seen by

Sr. D.M.O. (Ophth) who advised that he should be sent to BAM

Hospital Byculla for a colour vision package test. His colour

vision package test was done at BAM Hospital Byculla on

Digitaly signed by SUDESH SHAKHI

SUDESH DN: C=IN, O=CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE

TRIBUNAL, OU=JODHPUR BENCH, Phone=

21.06.2016. Then again, he was referred to Sr. D.M.O.a b2 2 7 6c 96 9(e 03 7b 4O7 c0 a8 17 c31 56pd2 05 73 84tc8 ,f 2 Pha o3 sc ta0.lc C5 o5)dc e7 =4 35 4e 25 0a 05 63 ,9 Saa =4870d

Rajasthan, SERIALNUMBER=

F709B6DE94E2153CCFD55F34387F3BB788E0FF850

SHAKHI A83262E2D1BB72EA7ADF651, CN=SUDESH

SHAKHI

Jaipur with report of colour vision package test. Sr.R Loe ca as to ion nD: :I am .theM author .of Othis do.cum ent

Date: 2026.01.29 16:00:28+05'30'

Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2025.1.0

3

290/00093/2019

(Opth.) finally opined that his colour vision package test shows

mild deutranomalous trichomatrism. On EGL (13 mm) he reads

yellow as red – colour defective. Thereafter, the Chief Medical

Superintendent, N.W. Railway, Bikaner referred the case as per

IRMM 2000. Thereafter, the Medical Board was constituted

which in its meeting held on 03.11.2016 opined that there is a

lot of variation in perception of colour vision at different places,

therefore, Sh. Satyendra Kumar s/o Sh. Gupteshwar Prasad is

malingerer for colour vision as there is a lot of inconsistency.

Hence, he may be dealt as per Para 512 sub note 2(ii) of IRMM

2000.

2.4 B