Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajnish Kumar Rai, J, Manju Pandey, A
Ram Chandra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Communication & (I.T) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer orders and disciplinary action context. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of the transfer and consequences of non-compliance. (Para 4 , 5 , 10) |
| 3. judicial observations on compliance and jurisdiction matters. (Para 12 , 15 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. the necessity of adhering to natural justice. (Para 18) |
| 5. conclusion regarding the dismissal of the application. (Para 22 , 23) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Ms. Manju Pandey, Member (A):
The applicant in person and Mr. Vidyapati Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents, are present and heard.
2. The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , praying for the following relief(s):-
“(i) The Honble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to quash the- (1) Impugned Memo No. B/Ram Chandra Prasad/D.P.dated Bahraich 28.06.2012, issued by Spos Bahraich respondent 6 Annexure A-1 as well as.
(ii) Impugned Memo No. B/Ram Chandra Prasad/12-13 dated Bahraich 26.06.2017, issued by Spos Bahraich respondent No.6 Annexure A-2 as well as.
(iii) Impugned Memo No. R.P.G/VIG/M-19/16/2014 dated 07-02-2017,issued by D.P.S Gorakhpur respondent No. 4 Annexure A-3 as well as.
(iv) Impugned
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
