ORDER

Shri Ashish Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Krishna Deo Rai, learned counsel for the respondents, were present at the time of hearing.

2. The instant original application has been filed seeking following relief:

“(i) This Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 22.02.2024 passed by the respondent no. 3 (Annexure No. A-1 to this Original Application with compilation No. I)

(ii) This Honb’le Tribunal may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of applicant for grant of compassionate appointment as per rule.

(iii) Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case may be given in favour of the applicant.

(iv) Award the costs of the original application in favour of the applicant.”

3. The compendium of the facts narrated in the instant original application is that the applicant is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 22.02.2024 passed by the respondent no. 3 by way of which his claim for appointment on compassionate grounds has been rejected by the respondents citing the ground that both the sons of the late employee are married and matured. The applicant seeks quashin