Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta Sen, Judicial Member, Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member
Bamandas Pattanayak – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the applicant's service history and challenges faced. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding pension calculations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. discussion on compulsory retirement vs voluntary retirement. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's conclusion affirming previous rulings and dismissing o.a. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. final decision on the appeal. (Para 13) |
ORDER
Urmita Datta Sen, Judicial Member
The applicant has preferred this O.A. under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:-
“a) Your applicant prays that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 17.06.2017 which is Annexure A/14 to this application;
b) In view of the above facts, judgments of various courts including the Supreme Court referred above and Hon’ble Kolkata High Court Judgment dated 20.01.2014 the petitioner appeals to the Hon’ble CAT judges to issue a judgment order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to quash or set aside the penalty of compulsory retirement imposed illegally without any enquiry proceedings following applicable rules and recalculate the petiti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
