Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Jayesh V Bhairavia, J, Hukum Singh Meena, A
Shri Suryakant Ambalal Shah – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India & Others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to memo regarding financial upgradation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both the applicant and the respondents. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. review of eligibility parameters for macp and implications of ldce. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. tribunal's finding on recognition of promotions for macp. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. final decision to allow the oa. (Para 12) |
ORDER
Per : Hon’ble Dr.Hukum Singh Meena, Member (A)
1. In the instant OA, the applicant being aggrieved with the Memo No. Staff/63-5/MACPs/2016 dated 05.12.2016 issued by the office of the Chief Postmaster General, Gujarat Circle Khanpur, Ahmedabad whereby the 3rd Financial Up-gradation granted to the applicant in the grade pay of Rs. 4800/- with pay band of Rs. 9300- 34800 w.e.f. 15.11.2013 was withdrawn, has filed the present OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 seeking following reliefs:-
“VIII. Relief/Reliefs Sought for:
In the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, the applicant most respectfully prays this Hon'ble Tribunal that_
i) May be pleased to admit and allow this original application.
ii) May pleased to declare the impugned Orders No.
a) Staff/63-5/MACPS/2016 dated 5-12-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
