Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K.HARIPAL, J, V.RAMA MATHEW, ACJ
Mohanan.M.V. – Appellant
Versus
Principal Director General, Directorate of Performance Management, Customs & Goods & Services Tax – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of service and application details. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments for financial upgradation based on service duration. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's observations on eligibility and financial directives. (Para 3) |
| 4. final ruling and payment order. (Para 4) |
ORDER
HON'BLE Ms.V.RAMA MATHEW, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
Briefly speaking the factual matrix is as under – the applicant commenced service as a Stenographer with respondents on 19.08.1983. Later he was promoted as Intelligence Officer on 16.03.1990 and further he was granted 2nd financial upgradation under MACP Scheme with effect from 01.09.2008. He is presently working as Senior Intelligence Officer under the 4th respondent with effect from 30.07.2009. The claim of the applicant was for 2nd financial upgradation with effect from 01.01.2006 to the Grade Pay of Rs.4800/- and the Grade Pay of Rs.5400/- with effect from 01.01.2010 as per Para x(e) of the Resolution dated 01.09.2008 under the MACP Scheme.
2. During the course of hearing the applicant himself has submitted that all his claims were covered by the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M.Subramaniam vs. Union of India & Ors. In SLP (C) No.17576/2017, and the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
