Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Suchitto Kumar Das, ACJ, Diwakar Singh, JM
Smt. Sima Biswas (Moitra) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. counsel's presentation and lack of respondents. (Para 1 , 2 , 7) |
| 2. challenge to retirement age based on binding judicial precedents. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. request for consideration of representations regarding retirement. (Para 6) |
| 4. direction to consider representations and maintain status quo. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. conclusion and disposition of the case. (Para 10) |
ORDER (O R A L)
Per: Hon’ble Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das (A):
1. Ld Counsel for the applicant is present. He files affidavit of service which is taken on record.
2. It is noted that although notice has been served upon the respondents, none appears for them.
3. The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, praying for the following relief(s):-
“a. A direction upon the concerned respondent authorities i.e. respondent nos. 2 and 3 to forthwith quash and set-aside the order of retirement which is annexure "A1" to this original application and give effect to and implement the award of the CGIT, Bangalore, as upheld by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka, by enhancing the age of superannuation of the applicant from 58 years to 60 years and allow the Petitioner to conti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
