Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, J, Pramod Kumar Das, A
Subash Chandra Lenka – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's employment status and promotion issues discussed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents' counters and promotions outlined. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. discussion regarding limits of claim timeframes. (Para 7) |
| 4. court's rationale for denying the promotion request. (Para 8) |
| 5. final remarks regarding dismissal and costs. (Para 9) |
ORDER
PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A):
Filtering the case establishes that while the applicant was working in one seniority Unit [S.E.Rly. Bondamunda] as Khalasi since 21.01.1989, he was transferred to another seniority Unit [Dongoaposi], in his present capacity, where he reported to duty on 25.12.1996. On 05.06.2003, seniority list of Tech.III of Bondamunda seniority unit was published wherein his name did not find place. He was repatriated back to his parent seniority Unit on 16.07.2003. Departmental examination was held for promotion to the post of Jr. Engineer but the applicant could not get the chance to appear since his name did not figure in the Seniority List of Tech.III. However, subsequently, on his repatriation and, on consideration of his representation, he was granted promotion to Tech.III w.e.f. 03/04.10.1997, i.e. the date when his im
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
