SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1009

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Awadhesh Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
General Manager N E Rly – Respondent


ORDER

(By Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (Judicial)

Shri A.K. Dave and Shri Anil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Vijay Kumar Singh and Shri Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents, were present at the time of hearing.

2. The instant original application has been filed by the applicant seeking following relief:

“(i) To quash the order dated 09-03-2017 (Annexure No. A-1) passed by the respondent no 1 and 2.

(ii) Direct the respondents to consider the promotion of the applicants on the post of Assistant Station Master in accordance with law.

(iii) To pass any order which this Hon’ble Tribunal deems fit under the circumstances of the case.

(iv) To award cost in favour of the applicant.”

3. The instant original application has been filed by the applicants challenging the order dated 09.03.2017 passed by the respondent no 1 and 2 by way of which the respondents have selected the respondents no 003 to 8 (private respondents) on the posts of Assistant Station Master issued in view of notification / advertisement dated 24.02.2016. The contention of the applicants is that respondents have illegally selected non-deserving and ineligible candidates. They h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top