Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Anand S. Khati, A
Sonali Badhe – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's reliefs and procedural history (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicant's challenge to charge sheet validity (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents' defense of rule 14 compliance (Para 4) |
| 4. applicant's rejoinder on procedural flaws (Para 5) |
| 5. court's review of original file and approval (Para 6 , 7) |
| 6. direct applicant to file defense; abeyance order (Para 8) |
O R D E R
By Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J) :-
1.In the present Original Application (O.A.), the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:
“a) Quash and set aside the Chargesheet bearing File No. F.No. C-14011/2/2024-AD.EF dated 26.12.2024 issued to the applicant which was received by her on 9.1.2025 being malafide and non-compliance of Rule 14 and hence the chargesheet is vitiated.
b) Direct that the recommendation of the Selection Committee for the post of Additional Director of Enforcement (Prosecution) in relation to the Applicant in a which has been kept in “sealed cover” be opened and the same may be informed to the applicant.
c) Quash and set aside the Order bearing File No. A-35011/25/2021-Ad.ED dated 3/4.3.2025 under the signatures of the Under Secretary (Ad.ED) by which it has been informed that the Approval has b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
