Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Member (J), Anand S Khati, Member (A)
Rampur Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police Delhi Police Hdqrs. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's recruitment process, acquittals, and candidature cancellation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents justify screening committee's suitability assessment. (Para 3) |
| 3. applicant's rejoinder distinguishes cited precedents. (Para 4) |
| 4. impugned order quashed; direct reconsideration for appointment. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
By Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J):
In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:—
“(i) Direct the Respondents to set aside and quash order dated 12.12.2024 and grant appointment to the Applicant w.e.f. the date when others who had participated in the examination and succeeded, were granted appointment;
(ii) Direct the Respondents to award all consequential benefits, including back wages, continuity of service, seniority, arrears of fixation of pay at par with other similarly placed, to the Applicant; and
(iii) Any other or further order as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit.”
2. Brief facts of the case as narrated by learned counsel for the applicant are as under:-
2.1 The applicant has filed the present Original Application challenging the impugned o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
