CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Megha Garg – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi – Respondent
O.A./1883/2022
##PAGE1##
1
OA No. 1883/2022
Item No.67/C-4
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
O.A. No. 1883/2022
Reserved on : 20.01.2026
Pronounced on : 05.02.2026
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
Hon’ble Dr. Anand S. Khati, Member (A)
Megha Garg,
D/o Praveen Garg,
Aged about 25 years,
R/o H.No.A-20, GF
Lane-2, East Krishna Nagar, New Delhi-51
Group 'B’,
Sub: Appointment.
... Applicant
(By Advocate: Mr. Ranjit Sharma)
Versus
1. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Through the Commissioner
S.P. Mukherjee Civic Centre
J.L.N Marg, New Delhi-02
2. The Director of Education
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
S.P. Mukherjee Civic Centre
J.L.N. Marg, New Delhi-110002.
...Respondents
(By Advocate: Mr. Yudhishter Sharma)
Digitally signed by JYOTI JAIN
Date: 2026.02.06 16:47:30+05'30'
##PAGE2##2
OA No. 1883/2022
Item No.67/C-4
ORDER
Hon’ble Dr. Anand S. Khati, Member (A)
In the present Original Application (O.A.) filed under Section
19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has
sought for the following reliefs:-
“i) quash communication dt.12-08-2021 (ANNEXURE A1
supra) with direction to the respondents to consider the
applicant for appointment to the post of Special Educator
against Post-Code 15/17 in M.C.D with all consequential
benefits
AND/OR
ii) pass such other order/s as may be deemed fit & proper.”
2. Highlighting the facts of the case, learned counsel for the
applicant submitted that the applicant has impugned the order
dated 12.08.2021 (Annexure A1), whereby her candidature to the
post of Special Educator (Primary) has been rejected, stating that
during the document verification it was found that the applicant did
not possess minimum essential qualification for the post as on cutoff
date, i.e., 15.09.2017. He submitted that the applicant completed her
B.Ed. in the academic year 2015-17. He further submitted that the
selection test was held on 22.07.2018 as evident from the Admit
Card (Annexure A3). Therefore, as on 22.07.2018, the applicant was
qualified and eligible for appointment to the post of Special
Educator.
Digi tally signed by JYOTI JAIN
Date: 2026.02.06 16:47:30+05'30'
##PAGE3##3
OA No. 1883/2022
Item No.67/C-4
3. He relied upon the decision rendered by the Hon’ble High
Court of Delhi in W.P.(C) No.9040/2019 dated 21.08.2019 titled
Praveen Khatri and Ors. vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.,
highlighting the following:
“……The only reason why the petitioner's candidature has
been cancelled is that they did not have Central Teacher
Eligibility Test (CTET) qualification /examination clearance on
the cut off date, though they have got the said qualification
before the completion of the recruitment process. He submits
that the CTET qualification could not be obtained by them since
the CBSE had not conducted the CTET examination for two
years and it was only held by the CBSE in the year 2018.
Normally, this Court would not indulge in such requests
since all concerned should follow the recruitment rules, lest it
opens flood gates with similar requests.
However, the position is materially different in the present
case inasmuch, as, we are dealing with a much larger number of
vacancies, than the number of qualified candidates who are
available and who have cleared the examination. The aspect of
filling up of posts of Special Education Teachers requires urgent
attention, and calls for sensitivity towards children in need of
such special education. Non-filling of the existing vacancies over
the years has led to the children with special needs sufferings
and deprivation.
We, therefore, direct the respondents to not view the
situation that presently arises in routine and straightjacket
manner, and to keep in view the objective-which is of filling up
the large number of vacant posts of Special Education Teachers,
from amongst candidates who are otherwise qualified. In the
peculiar situation taken note of hereinabove, even if the
qualified candidates have obtained the CTET qualification after
the cut-off date, but before their appointment and even if they
may have become over age such aspects could be rel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.