Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, J, Mohan Pyare, A
Vinod Kumar Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to suspension and extensions sans timely charge sheet. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. suspension reviewed timely from effective date; delay justified. (Para 4 , 6 , 12 , 13 , 17) |
| 3. rules and precedents limit prolonged suspension without charges. (Para 5 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. no violation found; oa dismissed. (Para 7 , 8 , 18 , 19) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Mr. Mohan Pyare, Member (A)
Present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief:
“i) a suitable order or direction setting aside Order No. F- 4/2/2013-14 dated 28.03.2014 Passed by Respondent No. 4. whereby the applicant has been placed under suspension (Annexure A-1 to compilation No. 1)
ii) a suitable order or direction setting aside Order No. F4/2/2013/Ch II date 26.06.2014 (Annexure-A-2 to compilation No 1) passed by Respondent No. 4. whereby suspension period of the applicant has been extended for a further period of 90 days
iii) a suitable order or direction setting aside order No. F4/2/2013-14/Ch. IV dated 24.09.2014 (Annexure A-3 to compilation No. 1) passed by Respondent No. 4 whereby suspension period of the applicant has been exten
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
