Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, Judicial Member, Mohan Pyare, Administrative Member
Sukumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to suspension and extensions for delayed charge sheet and untimely review. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. rules on suspension effective date, 90-day review, and ajay kumar choudhary limits. (Para 6 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. analysis of precedents; review within time from effective date. (Para 7 , 8 , 11 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. no violation; oa dismissed. (Para 18 , 19) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Mr. Mohan Pyare, Member (A)
Present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief:
“i) a suitable order or direction setting aside Order No. F- 4/2/2013-14 dated 26.05.2014 Passed by Respondent No. 4.whereby the applicant has been placed under suspension (Annexure A-1 to compilation No. 1)
ii) a suitable order or direction setting aside Order No. F4/2/2013/Ch III date 25.08.2014 (Annexure-A-2 to compilation No 1) passed by Respondent No. 4.whereby suspension period of the applicant has been extended for a further period of 90 days
iii) a suitable order or direction setting aside order No. F4/2/2013-14/Ch. V dated 21.11.2014 (Annexure A-3 to compilation No. 1) passed by Respondent No. 4 whereby suspension period o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
