Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash, J, Mohan Pyare, A
Amar Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to penalty orders post-criminal acquittal. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on procedural lapses and rule 14(18) non-compliance. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. analysis of precedents on inquiry safeguards. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. mandatory rule 14(18) vitiates proceedings for prejudice. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. quash orders, grant benefits, allow fresh inquiry. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER
(By Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (Judicial) Shri S K Kushwaha, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri M P Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents, were present at the time of hearing.
2. The instant original application has been filed by the applicant seeking following relief:
“(i) To issue directions / orders/ writs in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 23.10.2008, 20.09.2004 and 28.10.2003 passed by respondent no. 3, 4 & 5 (Annex. A-1, A-2 & A-3) respectively, especially in view of the order dated 07.04.2015 passed in the criminal appeal, honorably acquitting the applicant in the same charges.
(ii) To consider for issuing orders or directions / writ, in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to immediately reinstate the applicant as if the penalty orders hav
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
